deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
Found 4154 relevant deviations

The Journal Portal

Tune into the voice of the community by checking out deviantART's Journal Portal. Join the conversation by browsing, adding faves, and leaving comments, or submit your own Journal to let your voice be heard.

Submit Journal

Community Mood

  • Love
  • Joy
  • Wow!
  • Affection
  • Adoration
  • Love 22755
  • Joy 18478
  • Wow! 4703
  • Affection 1752
  • Adoration 1069

Polls

What is your preferred drawing software?

Vote! (57,341 votes) 3,829 comments
59,843 Deviants Online
STEP 1: The problem.
You have a problem.
Don't tell me you don't have problems.
Everyone has problems.
Determine what your biggest problem is.
Don't have a big problem? Too scared to admit it?
You can start smaller- How about a small problem?
How about something that concerns/bothers/confuses you today/this week/recently?
Come up with a bunch of keywords that describe your problem.

STEP 2: Ask google for solution to your problem.
Google your question using ALL the possible keyword combinations that your problem relates to or has in it.
See if anyone already has a similar problem or has already resolved it.
Take 3 hours if you must.
Finding correct information can get tough, especially if it is obscure, hidden, answered incorrectly or has conflicting answers.
Answers without proper sources or evidence are generally incorrect and should be disregarded.

If there are too many conflicting solutions and opposing answers and you're not sure which is correct,
Use the principle of "Occam razor" to figure out the most correct answer.
"Simpler explanations are, other things being equal, generally better than more complex ones.
Among competing hypotheses, the one that makes the fewest assumptions should be selected."
Occam's razor is used in medicine when there are many explanations for symptoms and the simplest diagnosis usually is the correct one.
If a child has a runny nose, they probably have the common cold instead of a rare birth defect.
If a tree suddenly feel down in a forest - wind was responsible, not a wizard.

STEP 3: Report results
How successful were you?
Were you able to solve your problem?
Rick Santorum says; "LOLNOPE :icontrollfaceplz:"

[link]

This is probably the truest political comic I've ever seen on this website :heart:

You know your government is in bad shape when Presidential candidates are saying things like "DERP I'M A MORMON" or "I VOW TO OUTLAW ABORTION/BIRTH CONTROL/GAY MARRIAGE BECAUSE IT CONFLICTS WITH THE COUNTRY'S MY BELIEFS LULZ". I mean...seriously? I don't care that you're a Mormon, and I don't care that you live and breathe whatever's in your Bible; what I care about, and what the entire country should care about, is what kind of stuff you can actually change.

Hey, politicians;
:bulletred: Abortion:
- Even if you outlawed it, people won't stop getting them. The only thing that will change, is that after that law is passed there will be massive, possibly violent protests, and more women and babies dead because they didn't have access to safe, sterile abortion clinics.

:bulletred: Birth Control:
- Is not just for "irresponsible sluts" to go out, have wild sex and not have to worry about getting pregnant. It helps balance a woman's hormones, and helps regulate her period so it isn't as bad. It treats ovarian cysts, and also lessens the amount of blood a woman loses (fun fact; if a woman bleeds too much, she could lose too much iron and develop ANEMIA. Or possibly DIE). Also has the added benefit of preventing a woman from getting pregnant (which, I guess, would be bad news for the Republicans, because then they wouldn't have any unborn fetuses to use as leverage). Here's an idea; if you outlaw women's birth control, outlaw condoms, too. It's only fair that it goes both ways! :dummy:

:bulletred: Gay Marriage:
- Just give up. You're going to lose that fight, and you're going to be butthurt as all hell when you FINALLY realize it. No matter WHAT you say OR do, people will continue to be gay/trans/bi/pan/lesbian/what-have-you, and there is absolutely nothing you can do to stop that. If you have to stop anyone from doing anything, just outlaw sex for straight people! It's their fault for makin' gay babies :la:


But honestly...any of the current candidates are probably better than the idiot we have in Office right now. If I could have, I would've voted for McCain. Why? Because he's been in politics longer and has more experience, was a prisoner of war (that's why he can't raise his arms above his shoulders), and actually had a decent campaign. Not the best, but decent. I really think one of the reasons he lost was because Palin's daughter was pregnant, and "OH WE CAN'T HAVE THAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE, TEENAGE GIRLS WILL THINK IT'S OKAY TO GET PREGNANT" :roll:

Obama?
- He was a freshman Senator before he was elected, attended flag burnings, and campaigned to have the National Anthem changed.
- While he's been in office, the National Debt has increased $4 TRILLION ("the most rapid increase in debt under any President" [link] )
- Gas has gone up from $1.29 or so to $3.69, over the span of four years (contributing factors being the BP oil spill and the unrest in the Middle East)
- If Obama had kept his campaign promise, all troops would be out of Afghanistan/Iraq/Iran by now. They're not, and they probably won't be in the foreseeable future.
- His family's vacation to Hawaii totaled $4 million. And that's just one, seventeen-day excursion. How many other vacations has he taken during his Presidency that have cost just as much or possibly MORE??
- No matter what the government tells you, we're in a recession. Which has only gotten worse under Obama. If you haven't come to this realization, then you're either in MAJOR denial or you live under a fuckin' rock :|


WHY DO WE HAVE PEOPLE LIKE THIS IN THE FUCKIN' WHITE HOUSE?? What, are they trying to ruin America? Because THEY'RE DOING A DAMN GOOD JOB SO FAR.

I say we just get everyone who is currently in office OUT, and start over. NO MONEY-HUNGRY ASSHOLES IN POSITIONS OF POWER, NO RELIGION IN MY GOVERNMENT, FAIR TAXES, NO BAILOUTS OR TAX BREAKS FOR THE RICH OR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, NO PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR ILLEGALS AND THE RICH, NO FOOD STAMPS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHILE THE AMERICAN CITIZENS GO HUNGRY, AND FAIR, CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS.

The American people first; everything else second :|

</angrypoliticalrant>
One day, way back in college, the Catholic chaplain heard me play the piano and offered me a position as an accompanist at his parish. I wasn't Catholic but I accepted anyway because I wanted the money. As far as jobs go, it wasn't much of one - I usually worked just one day a week and made $200 a month tops. But I was getting paid to do something I enjoyed and that was fun. Plus it was amusing in a weird sort of way watching the collection baskets get passed around at every mass and knowing that some of that money would soon make its way into my pocket.

What did I spend all that "Catholic" money on? More like what didn't I spend it on. With most of my room and board already included with tuition, I was free to buy - among other things - all sorts of alcohol, porn, satanic blackmetal (back when people actually bought music), slutty clothes, and - most memorably - an athame for my wiccan ex-girlfriend's 20th birthday (I did mention I wasn't Catholic, right?) And yes, since you all know where this is going, I bought condoms. And used them.

Of course, none of this affected my employment. Father Ron grew more dismayed every time he discovered more details of my life, and probably even regretted making the job offer in the first place. But I was polite enough not to let the rest of my life affect my appearance in church or my performance at work, and he was smart enough to realize that once the paycheck was signed, it was my money and he had no right to tell me what I could or couldn't spend it on.

Apparently this logic is lost on the Obama administration, whose Department of Health and Human Services seems hell-bent on requiring Catholic employers, over their own religious objections, to provide birth control for their employees. Supporters of the requirement say that it will keep Catholics from "forcing" their religion on anyone else. But, as my own experience demonstrates, you can work at a Catholic organization - even a church - and spend your pay on whatever degenerate lifestyle you choose, so long as it doesn't interfere with your work. In reality it's the government forcing its own secular worldview on private citizens - demanding that Catholics spend above and beyond what they're already paying their employees just to buy them free birth control.

The Catholic church has many arguments against contraception. Some of them are actually rather interesting. But contraception isn't the issue here. The government's action would be just as uncalled for if it were directed against Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, or other religious individuals or organizations and demanding (under threat) that they violate equally important tenets of their belief. And if this mandate is allowed to stand, it's only a matter of time before other faiths are threatened in the same way.

Don't let the news fool you - there has been no "compromise" on this issue. As fate would have it, I have a story for that too. A few months into my "job," a close friend shocked me with the news that he and his girlfriend had been having sex, that she was pregnant, that he wanted her to have an abortion, and that he couldn't pay for it and had come to me because I always seemed to have lots of extra cash on hand. I turned him away. I still had all sorts of conflicting views on abortion at that point in my life - but when the time came to make a decision, I knew I just couldn't support what was about to happen.

Despite the weirdness of it all, I did still think of Cam as a friend. At least I did until he called me a week later and said he was in some unspecified "trouble" and needed $450 cash before a certain date. Of course he still needed it for his girlfriend's abortion and for some reason he thought I'd be more willing to lend him the money if he didn't specify what it was for. I'm not the smartest person in the world, but I'm not that stupid.

President Obama's compromise leaves all the essentials in place and changes nothing except for how and under what guise the money will be extorted for the exact same purpose. Clearly he thinks you are that stupid.

Please continue to fight this unjust and unconstitutional assault on our religious freedoms

Church of Let's Play

Journal Entry: Tue Aug 7, 2012, 1:05 PM
  • Mood: Humor
  • Listening to: Twister -Kingdom Mix-
  • Reading: Descriptions
  • Watching: Cutscenes
  • Playing: Kingdom Hearts 3D: Dream Drop Distance
  • Eating: Dreams
  • Drinking: Potions
[link]

EVERYONE BOW YOUR HEAD AND PRAY TO JESUS GRANDMA LORD CHUGGAACONROY.

IT'S EVIL!!

YOUTUBE WHORES.


God, what is this? :XD:

One thing that makes me mad is when Christians act like other Christians are not Christians only because they do not go to the same church, or don't have the exact same views on matters which really aren't that vital to salvation. Jesus prayed for our unity (John 17) - so why are we so often emphasising our differences?

I just find people pretty narrow who think their own denomination is the only right one. They lose A LOT. They are missing out.

I grew up in various protestant denominations - as a missionary kid you hardly get a choice, since depending where you are you won't get your preferred denomination of church (the closest to our house was baptist - we're not officially baptist), or you can get such a density of different denominations that you have a pretty broad choice (the district in Taipei where I grew up has SUCH a church density it's weird. Walk down one street and you have a presbyterian, a nazarene, a catholic and an episcopal church one after the other at 30 mins or less walking distance. And that's a traditionally Buddhist/Taoist/Animist country with less than 5% Christians!). Plus, on the mission field the most stupid thing you can do is work against each other (in my opinion). Sure, protestants and catholics have a long history of working against each other and trying to convert each other's converts (it's better now), but protestants at least have started working together more. My parents went out with an inter-denominational mission and are, in fact, from different denominations.

Now if you grow up going to a different denomination almost every week becasuse your parents get invited to preach in random churches, then you don't believe in defending one particular denomination. The denominations I've been exposed to are: baptist, pentecostal, brethren, presbyterian / reformed (Calvinist and Zwinglian - which are different), methodist, anglican / episcopal, all sorts of evangelical, Lutheran, charismatic, ... right now I go to an interdenominational (protestant) church and I'm glad this kind of church exists!!! Why do we waste our time disagreeing? You won't be any less baptised if you're sprinkled rather than dunked. And a really liturgical anglican service can be just as spiritually enriching as, if not more than, a modern charismatic service.

What I want to say is: if you limit yourself to one way of doing church, you miss out on a lot of treasures. There is so much I have learned and gained from not being shy of checking out catholic stuff. We used to live close to a catholic church in Singapore where they had sculptures of the Stations of the Cross outside the church, and we'd take walks there and my parents would explain the Stations of the Cross. If you don't know what the Stations of the Cross / Via Crucis is, I highly recommend checking it out. [link] It's one thing that has really affected me from the time I was a child. We had our Lutheran church services in a Catholic building in Taiwan (imagine that - it's actually pretty ironic) and I always loved looking at the Via Crucis - they had wooden carvings of the ten stations along the walls. The Via Crucis is a way to remember how Jesus died for us - ro remember the different parts of the story, and also to meditate on what it meant.

Another thing is saint biographies. I don't see anything wrong with having saints. Except maybe that in the end no one is "holier" in the Kingdom of God, so it's not necessarily "correct" to act as if some select few people are more special or precious to God than others? BUT I find saints really good as examples and I think protestants miss out on something if they don't learn about and learn from the Christians who went before. I like saints because their stories inspire. In the same way, I also love reading biographies of people who were not sainted but who probably would have been if the protestant church had such an institution. ;)

I may have shocked or even insulted protestants and catholics with some of the stuff I've said now... ^^; If I have, I am sorry - it was not intentional. I just think we should learn from each other - we might not be willing to give up some theological opinions (I know I wouldn't want to switch to catholic theology in some aspects =P) but I believe there's more to be gained from a sisterly/ brotherly exchange like that which I experienced on the "mission field" than from acting as if the others are not real Christians. Only God can decide who the real Christians are. If we see others acting in what we think is un-Christian, then we need to gently correct them (read Matthew 18), not judge them or throw them out straight away. I won't pretend everything in every denomination is "right", but if there's something really glaringly wrong, then we need to address that with love and not with rejection. I'm seeing too much rejection.

Working together IS possible. I have seen it happening. So please stop going all anti-ecumenism. You might just have a bad surprise in heaven otherwise when the people you thought would certainly not be there ARE THERE. =P (Hey, it should be a good surprise!) (Or not a surprise at all :meow:)
I highly recommend visiting a totally different church service once. It might be weird and jarring at first (I took 3 weeks getting used to our episcopal church; now I miss it - I miss the weekly eucharist and yes, I really miss the kneeling!!) but it can be enriching to see that the same Gospel can be "clothed" differently and still be the same. And getting to know believers in a totally different church, and seeing they are just as passionate as those in your own church, can be a wonderful experience too.

But you know, that's the wonderful thing about growing up in a country where Christianity is the obvious minority. You stick together more, and you are happier about finding another Christian than finding another methodist or another lutheran or whatever. And you become explosively happy when your non-Christian friend starts attending a catholic church even though you aren't catholic (and don't necessarily want them to be catholic), just because that friend is starting to get to know Jesus. I don't believe in making my friends presbyterian or pentecostal; I believe in making them disciples of Jesus and if they think they want to be orthodox Christians then that's fine by me, as long as they have JESUS.

I'm proud to be a mixed mess of denominations and nothing will ever change that. :la:
  • Mood: Lazy
  • Listening to: Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina
  • Reading: Thesis stuff
  • Drinking: Water
Anyone that knows me here knows I'm pretty private and can be a little weird about my identity.  I don't share very much personal information, I enjoy a certain amount of anonymity on the internet.  But I'm about to share some things that are very personal, I hope that in itself shows how important I think this issue is.

As much as it may shock some people, I have stated before and am pretty open about the fact that I was once a devoted Christian.  At a certain point of my life, I was even pretty radical and possibly a little fundamentalist, I was a 6 day creationist and bible literalist.  However, I was always more concerned with Christian ideas of charity, caring for the poor, homeless, widows, and less fortunate.  I saw Jesus as a pacifist, not a warmonger, and I put more stock in verses like "love thy neighbor" and "it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven" than old testament verses about how people should trim their beard and what clothes to wear.  It was seeing church corruption, evil acts of Christians, the petty bullshit, this constant judging of others and oppressing of anyone who seems "the other", that first started making me question Christianity.  I was quick to call out fellow Christians, and I was never afraid of authority and church leaders and would often speak very plainly about their actions, this obviously lead to some rather strained relationships even while I maintained my religion.  I was called a Satanist, possessed, the AntiChrist, the devil, a trouble maker, a deceiver, a rebel, a problem, etc all while I still held Christianity very close to my heart and followed very mainstream beliefs in theology.  It was simply because I was disgusted by Christians and church leaders using "God" as a way to lie, cheat, and steal from others, and said so.

I have a lot of interesting stories of church corruption.  I've had a lot of opportunity to see it, especially as I had some unique positions close to lots of different church leaderships.  But now, even out of the church, I find I have another front seat row to a disgusting and nauseating situation I'd like to share, and this one is especially troubling to me because of the respect I once had for this church (or at least some within it).

First let me tell you a little history.  I first started attending this church at the height of my religious experience, I was relatively young, recently baptized.  While I had grown up in the church, I had made my own conscious decision at 18 to become a Christian after being a tad "rebellious" as a younger teenager, and my recent "born again" conversion had me "on fire" for my new but familiar faith, but I was also becoming more educated in theology and the bible.  My previous church where I was "converted" and baptized was in another town, which I moved to right out of high school, and after a year I had to move back to my home town for personal reasons.  I was eager to join a church, so I was excited to hear of one that someone I knew attended a few times at the community college.  They met in the community college cafeteria on Sunday mornings, since the school was essentially empty (and they had permission to be there).  Despite the location, there weren't many young people...there weren't many people in general, a hundred or two max (it was much smaller at first).  I quickly became not just a regular there, but got close to the youth leader, the music team, a few elders, the two pastors, and a few who would later take more active administration roles.  I also met people there who got me involved in other Christian organizations in town, where I eventually got connections to virtually every church leader in the city.

Eventually I moved to another city in another state, and then after that went to college (I was a little late to hop on that bandwagon).  But I still maintained several of my connections at that church, some in my family continued to attend that church, and I went back any time I was in town.  After several years I moved back there temporarily for awhile, and went right back attending and was fairly active at the church.  All of this is not to try to toot my horn or anything, as all of this doesn't really mean jack to me anymore, but I want to demonstrate that I had a history with that church from a point near it's beginning, a deep personal connection with core people of that church, and somewhat of an insiders perspective.

The first little controversy happened in 2007, after I had moved away.  After years of being in the community college cafeteria, the church had purchased a building.  This was a site of an older church, an established and respected church in a central area of town.  Ironically that church had just built a new facility near the community college slightly out of town (a very very large new facility I might add).  My old church purchased the property for about $3 million.  That might seem pretty steep, but this town does have pretty outrageous real estate, so for a pretty big central property most people didn't make too big a fuss about that cost.  But the church wanted to renovate the old church on the property.  Originally this project was going to cost an additional one million dollars.  Where the community started to raise eyebrows was when during construction the church then needed another million dollars.  This church of a few hundred went from meeting in a school cafeteria to having a property of $5 million.  The renovation was essentially a complete remodel, nothing of the old church was recognizable, and in the sanctuary is an Italian baptismal fount and a large mosaic made in an old monastery in the state that the church paid a large donation to in order to get the art piece (the pastors made a big deal about it).  Plus new state of the art sound equipment, kitchen supplies, things for the youth and day care centers, etc.  All for a congregation of about 300.  Now was the church nice?  Yes, but was it worth millions?  Probably not.  Does a church of that size need a building that costs $5 million?  Should churches be spending millions on such things at all?

The next controversy was around the same time, maybe a little later.  As I mentioned, this church had two pastors.  One was the "senior pastor" to appease the larger PCA system this church is a part of, but essentially they viewed themselves as equals.  One of these head pastors, we'll call him Larry, I had always viewed as more conservative and never really liked much.  He looked like a tv evangelist and had this too perfect hair cut, expensive sweaters and dress shoes, and this mustache that just had Ron Burgundy all over it.  He comes from a wealthy Texas steel family, sort of says it all.  I had been to his house a few times, a huge mansion of a house worth millions I'm sure (and apparently he has a second in Dallas), absolutely overflowing with taxidermy animals he had killed on African safaris.  Definitely took the part of Genesis about man being in dominion over the animals a little too literally.  Well there was other stuff in Genesis he took too literally.  He made news by throwing his money and weight behind a big anti-evolution movie, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.  But he didn't just give it support, he was co-executive producer.  This is a film that grossed $7.6 million, nearly $3 million opening weekend.  It also got really horrible reviews, most notably from the NY Times, primarily because it used sensationalism and hyperbole (and outright lies) to try to smear evolution not just in general but in the school system, using such tactics as essentially blaming Nazism on Darwin.  Shit you expect from teenagers here on DA, not something you expect from a big budget documentary.  Certainly not something I ever expected to come from this little church I attended, which I always saw as more socially liberal and tolerant despite the money and some conservative groups (those little groups are probably in every church in america).  I know for a fact many in that church aren't creationists, many accept evolution, so that this pastor went out of his way to associate with such a radical movie was pretty strange even to those within this Christian circle.  And it made the church the laughing stock in the town.   

But wait, it gets better!  A year or so later, as the church settled into the new building, they brought on a new assistant pastor into the church leadership.  I honestly never really knew her that well, but I was there while she was on staff.  I have to admit, it was a little shocking to see not just a woman at the front of the church on Sundays, but a young woman at that.  Let's be honest, it's not every church that lets women be in leadership positions.  Can you see where this is going yet?  That's right, "Larry" was getting a little friendly with the new young woman.  People noticed it too.  How could you not, they were practically flirting right at the pulpit at the head of the church Sunday mornings during the services in front of everyone!  It got downright weird and uncomfortable sometimes with his wife and new baby sitting right there.  It was getting around too, to the point where someone in my family overheard at a hair salon someone saying that Larry was having an affair with this woman.  People in the church starting speaking out, saying that Larry should step down from his position.  But, being the great sexist religion it is, when the heat was on it was this poor single woman that the church attacked.  They tried to scapegoat her, to demonize her and put all the blame on her, perhaps try to paint her as a slut or something, and even though they brought her in from out of state and even though she had basically done nothing wrong they gave her the boot without much warning.  Larry continued to work there, preaching on Sundays and ministering to people.  But the pressure didn't go away even after the woman was kicked out the church community, and eventually Larry announced he was "taking a break" from the church for a bit.  As far as I know, there was no formal dismissal, no apology or even acknowledgement of any wrongdoing, I don't even think he or the church ever said that he quit or stepped down.  But it's been awhile since then, Larry lives in Texas again I hear (still married after a lot of counseling), and there's a new associate pastor.  I have no idea what happened to that woman, I don't even think anyone in the church has talked to her since (so fucked up).  The church still claims there was no actual sexual misconduct, that there was no affair, who knows.  I think for the pastor it was more an ego trip anyways, he was always one for getting attention and always thought highly of himself (those Presbyterians sure do love the idea of being God's chosen).  I just recently heard that the other pastor said as much, saying what Larry's real issue was was arrogance (and hilariously called Larry a "princess") which I would say is pretty accurate.

All this is interesting and sort of funny, but it's not the real issue I wanted to bring to your attention.  What really disgusts and enrages me.

Through all this bullshit I still have family that attends that church.  Recently I was informed that they had met with someone who is part of the inner circle of that church (or was until they basically kicked her out of her own womens program, probably because she was too strong and independent a voice for women).  Apparently the church has new building additions planned.  That's right, that brand new building they already spent $5 million on wasn't good enough, they need to build more.  One of the primary things they plan on building is a theater for the youth.  The cost for this little project?  SIX MILLION DOLLARS!  Are you feeling nauseous yet?

I don't like hearing things second hand, so I got in touch with church leadership myself (they don't know I'm now an atheist, and I left that church even before I was an atheist from disgust of all the money there).  They confirmed that they are planning on spending $6 million for building additions.  The youth theater will seat 120 people.  This for a youth of maybe 30 kids, on a good day (I would know, I used to help the youth leadership).  When asked how they plan on financing such a project, they would not go into specifics, but they did say they do not plan on taking any bank financing, that the expect the church members will pay for all it.  They would not answer specifics about construction (I work a little in construction so I wanted to know if they were getting taken for a ride), it's still very early in planning, but based on their last construction project I wonder if we could even expect the construction budget to increase.  They would not answer how much they planned these facilities to be used.  I know for a fact that church already sits empty and unused nearly every day of the week.  Even with just a few simple questions, they got defensive and tried to paint it as necessary, and said something about a church overseas and how they work with a homeless ministry.  They would not give me any specifics on this church overseas though, nor would they give me the name of the homeless ministry or say how often they helped the organization.  But I learned myself that there is a homeless organization that's a pet project of someone in the church, but as far as I can see they don't even use the church facilities, they feed people once every three months in the Salvation Army parking lot!  And regardless of these other programs, they said specifically that it would be the construction of these church additions that would cost $6 million, the other projects are funded separately.  And my feelings anyways are so fucking what?  Is a church spending $6 million ever justified?  Does them feeding someone once every three months, or even once a day, mean that it's ok for them to spend $6 million on themselves?

(Not to mention I also uncovered another mini-scandal during all this.  There was someone in the church who wanted to start a program to help immigrants and open the church doors to an English as a Second Language program, as this area has a large Spanish speaking population.  Well the church denied it and shut down the program, saying it was "too big a liability" to have them in the building.  This person didn't go so far as to call the decision racist, though it was implied.  So when it's someone's wife's little pet project that doesn't really involve the church but might make it look good, it's ok, but when someone actually wants to help people then it's a "liability"...especially if they're poor Latinos.  Makes it sort of hard for them to claim they're interested to help the community and the poor and open their facilities to people.)  

Let me give you some statistics on my old home town.  The child poverty rate is over 20%.  In the state that goes up to 25%, a quarter of every child in the state is living in poverty.  According to the US Census Bureau, about a sixth of the total population of this town lives below the poverty line (a 5th of the total state population).  A local paper has recently done a series on increasing homelessness.  My guess is this has to do with the fact that the small county has by far the highest foreclosure rate in the state.  While the official unemployment rate is a little below the national average, it still more than doubled what it was before the subprime mortgage crisis.  Lately, thanks to the fucking tea baggers, there have been a lot of cuts to public services.  I know of three elementary schools and two middle schools that have been recently closed just in my old town (ironically over a budget deficit of about $6 million).  They plan on cutting more this year, specifically they're cutting education programs for special needs children, all over a $4 million budget issue.  These types of financial figures are something I expect from government and politics, or shady transnational corporations, but not from a small church of about 300 members in a relatively small town.  There are numerous issues that a church could spend money on if it were interested in helping the community, and when you think of the world (a child dies of starvation every three minutes, how many are dead since you started reading this?) then the opportunities to help are really limited only by your imagination.  What would you do with $6 million?  The LAST thing I would do is build some overpriced theater for a few rich white kids from yuppie Christian families.  If they want to build a theater why not build one for the whole fucking city, especially as all the schools are closing?  They're merely reinforcing their privileged Christian bubble, and their throwing such money around doing it is just a slap in the face to the community.

I wrote a long letter to the head pastor expressing pretty openly how I felt about this spending.  I have yet to hear a real response.  Though he has continued to defend the project to others I know who have begun questioning the spending of $6 million on building additions, he's so delusional that he says this theater will bring people from around the world to their church.  

What I really want to know is who is financing this project.  Something tells me if you follow the money, it will lead to some interesting places.  And how much of this money will really go where they said it will go?  How much do these church leaders make?  And they never have to pay a dime in taxes.  Something tells me there is some serious corruption here, with so much money how can there not be?  But even if there's not, just the fact that they're doing this is disgusting enough.  They have demonstrated perfectly why I left that church, why I started questioning Christianity ("God" really wants to spend $6 million on a theater while kids are starving?), and are a great example of Christian hypocrisy in general.

I am outraged and ashamed that this is happening at a place I used to be a part of and in my community.  But I also have a unique opportunity to share this information and make some noise about an issue I don't think many others will know about or openly discuss.  This church is certainly getting quiet about it.  I have contacted local newspapers with this information, as well as some local atheist groups.  If you're interested in helping spread this information, or even if you want to contact the church, I would greatly appreciate the support.
  • Mood: Outraged
  • Listening to: NunFuckRitual (yes that's a real band name)
  • Reading: Wind Through the Keyhole
  • Watching: Bones of Turkana
  • Drinking: coffee
I received this in a email  & had to share.

Mt. Vernon Texas Newspaper Headline

MT. VERNON, TEXAS, WHOREHOUSE SUES LOCAL CHURCH OVER LIGHTNING STRIKE!

Diamond D's brothel began construction on an expansion of their building to increase their ever-growing business. In response, the local Baptist Church started a campaign to block the business fromexpanding -- with morning, afternoon, and evening prayer sessions at their church. Work on Diamond D's progressed right up until the week before the grand reopening when lightning struck the whorehouse and burned it to the ground!

After the cat-house was burned to the ground by the lightning strike, the church folks were rather smug in their outlook, bragging about "the power of prayer." But late last week 'Big Jugs' Jill Diamond, the owner/madam, sued the church, the preacher and the entire congregation on the grounds that the church ... "was ultimately responsible for the demise of her building and her business -- either through direct or indirect divine actions or means."

In its reply to the court, the church vehemently and voraciously denied any and all responsibility or any connection to the building's demise. The crusty old judge read through the plaintiff's complaint and the defendant's reply, and at the opening hearing he commented, "I don't know how the hell I'm going to decide this damn case, but it appears from the paperwork that we now have a whorehouse owner who staunchly believes in the power of prayer, and an entire church congregation that thinks it's all bullshit!"  


:iconfacepalmplz::icondoublefacepalmplz::iconrikerfacepalmplz: Oh the irony.
Wacky in the sense of closeted bigotry, that is.

So I watched an episode of the Australian TV Show Q&A yesterday on Youtube. [link] It was Richard Dawkins discussing- what else?- religion with Cardinal Pell, a senior catholic leader in Australia. While Professor Dawkins was jetlagged, he did pretty okay.

The cardinal, though...

Let's just get to the juicy bits right away: Pell comments, when asked why god would reveal himself only to a small nation of illiterate shepherds, that "they were morally an intellectually inferior" to the Egypians and Babylonians, and that "...they still are."

Up until that moment, Pell had seemed halfway sympathetic: accepting of other viewpoints, insisting that atheists too can go to heaven (a direct contradiction of biblical dogma, but the catholics aren't really big on staying consistent). Liberal, accepting, though terribly ignorant.

But it gets better.

On the question of Jews, holocaust etc, Pell manages to say that "..the people who suffered the most historically were the Germans."

Eeeyup, the Germans.

Don't get me wrong, the Germans took a lot of shit, and if they had been treated humanely after WWI, we might not have had a WWII- but that's in no way comparable to the holocaust, or the centuries and centuries of jew persecution, egged on by the then boldly anti-semitic catholic church.

Really, catholic church? I mean, I know you're more or less responsible for most of the raging anti-semitism that eventually allowed for something as horrific as the holocaust in the first place, and I know you supported Hitler and hid nazis fleeing from retribution after WWII, but this is 2012. You're supposed to be just a LITTLE better than this.
  • Mood: Wow!
  • Listening to: Nuttin'
  • Reading: The Greatest Show On Earth
  • Watching: Atheist Experience
  • Playing: Nuttin'
  • Eating: Nuttin'
  • Drinking: Milk
Hey everyone! This is for all Seattleites and those that know anyone in the good city of Seattle!

I don't know who follows these people but I learned recently that the Westboro Baptist Church is going to be making an appearance here in Seattle on June 18, 2011 to protest at the Taking Back Sunday concert at the Showbox. For those of you who aren't incredibly familiar with the place, the Showbox is about a block or so away from Pike Place Market.

I was hoping to spread the word and try and get people to rally together for a counter protest like the one that happened over at the San Diego Comic Con. Nothing incredibly serious, just something so people aren't so focused on the WBC's stupidity.

And then we can go have ice cream or something afterwards!

There is a Facebook event page if you have one and would like to add your two cents or say your goin'~!

The time would be from 5:30PM-6:30PM on Saturday June 18th, 2011.

Please spread the word!

Thanks everyone!

L VS BB MINI CONTEST NOW ON WIN 800 POINTS

Journal Entry: Tue Nov 1, 2011, 3:35 PM

That's right Folks! #Church-Of-L Is now back in action and exploding back on to your laptop screens with a Mini Contest focusing on L and Beyond Birthday!



:iconchurch-of-l:



EDIT: THIS CONTEST HAS NOW BEEN EXTENDED UNTIL 7th OF DECEMBER! PLEASE BE SURE TO GET YOUR ENTRY IN ON THIS DATE (OR BEFORE)


Love L? Like the Los Angeles BB Murder Case? Want to see Beyond Birthday VS L? Look no further!

This is just a mini Contest we will be holding before we start our Chistmas Contest. The Contest is starting today ( 1st of November ) and will last until the 28th. Results Announcement will be subject to change however we guarantee the Winners will be announced before 3rd of December.

So....Want to learn how to get involved? Just read these Rules below. If you have any questions then please ask in this blog. Your question will be answered ASAP.



:bulletred: RULES: :bulletred:


:bulletwhite: Your Entry must have Beyond Birthday and L in interacting with each other in some sort (preferably arguing with eachother, killing each other or just generally against eachother in some form of predicament if unsure be sure to ask in this blog for other examples) however at the same time, it isn't essential that they both be up against eachother, this is only preferred. Other characters can also be in your submission but you must make sure B and L are the focus of the attention.


:bulletwhite:  You must state in your Deviation description that your entry is for #Church-Of-Ls L VS BB mini Contest.


:bulletwhite: All Entries must be submitted to the 2011 L VS BB Folder and must be in before or on the 28th of November.


:bulletwhite: One entry per person


:bulletwhite: Any and all Media aswell as Fanfictions are accepted to this Contest


:bulletwhite: Bloody work must have a filter

:bulletwhite: Any questions then ask in this blog.



:bulletred::bulletred: Prizes: :bulletred::bulletred:
First Place:

:bulletwhite: 800 Points
:bulletwhite: Llama badge
:bulletwhite: Group Feature
:bulletwhite: Featured on Affiliates front page

Second Place:

:bulletwhite: 200 Points
:bulletwhite: Llama badge
:bulletwhite: Group Feature
:bulletwhite: Featured on Affiliates front page

Third Place:

:bulletwhite: 80 points
:bulletwhite: Llama badge
:bulletwhite: Group Feature
:bulletwhite: Featured on Affiliates front page


Possible News Article may be made for this event. If so, all participants will be needed to +Fave to help with promotion. If there are not many participants/entries to the Contest the winnings will be divided between all those who have entered.


Who is Beyond Birthday?:


Beyond Birthday is a Character from Death Note: Another Note The Los Angeles BB Murder Case -- a Spin off from the original Death Note Series (but by a different Author). He is known to look like L and goes by the name Rue Ryuzaki.

Read the book for free here: [link]